Compatible Electronics, Inc. is an FDA ASCA-Accredited testing laboratory at all three Southern California locations, listed under ASCA ID# TL-80, TL-81, and TL-82. Our ASCA-accredited test reports for IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 61010-1, and other eligible standards can accompany FDA premarket submissions, giving the FDA enhanced confidence in testing results without additional methodology review.
The FDA Accreditation Scheme for Conformity Assessment (ASCA) is a program under which the FDA grants ASCA Recognition to qualified accreditation bodies, which in turn accredit testing laboratories that conduct premarket testing for medical device manufacturers. A testing laboratory that achieves ASCA Accreditation has demonstrated competency in performing tests to specific FDA-recognized consensus standards, and its reports carry enhanced weight in FDA premarket submissions.
Under the ASCA Program, when a device manufacturer submits a Declaration of Conformity with an ASCA Summary Test Report as part of their premarket submission (510(k), De Novo, or PMA), the FDA will not request additional information regarding the laboratory's testing methodologies — a significant time-saving benefit in the review process.
Compatible Electronics is one of a limited number of laboratories authorized by the FDA under this program. Our laboratory holds ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accreditation from NVLAP (Lab Code 200527-0) and is listed on the FDA ASCA-Accredited Testing Laboratories page for all three of our facilities.
Compatible Electronics holds ASCA Accreditation at each of our three Southern California facilities, each carrying its own ASCA ID. Manufacturers can verify our standing directly on the FDA's official listing page.
Our NVLAP scope includes all major ASCA-eligible standards drawn from the IEC 60601 and IEC 61010 families. The FDA# designations below correspond to the FDA's recognition numbers for each standard version. These are the standards for which Compatible Electronics can generate an ASCA Summary Test Report.
ⓘ The FDA does not require all normative references in FDA-recognized standards to themselves be FDA-recognized. Where test plans incorporate updated collateral standard editions (e.g., IEC 60601-1 ed. 3.2 clauses referenced in the 2020 collaterals), the ASCA Summary Test Report should highlight specific deviations and explain the rationale. Compatible Electronics engineers are experienced in documenting these nuances correctly for FDA review.
The ASCA program establishes a structured relationship between the FDA, accreditation bodies, testing laboratories, and device manufacturers. Understanding each party's role helps manufacturers plan their testing and submission strategy effectively.
The FDA grants ASCA Recognition to qualified accreditation bodies (such as NVLAP) that demonstrate competency in accreditation activities under the ASCA program specifications.
NVLAP assesses Compatible Electronics against ISO/IEC 17025:2017 plus the FDA ASCA program specifications for each eligible standard. Upon satisfactory assessment, ASCA Accreditation is granted.
A device manufacturer may elect to use Compatible Electronics as an ASCA-accredited laboratory for FDA premarket submissions. The manufacturer remains ultimately responsible for appropriate standard selection and test plan development.
Unlike pre-ASCA practice where manufacturers typically dictated the test plan, ASCA allows Compatible Electronics to take a more active role — reviewing the plan, providing feedback based on standards expertise, and requesting FDA guidance where essential performance or other complex questions arise.
Compatible Electronics performs all required tests and compiles an ASCA Summary Test Report. This report is purpose-built for FDA premarket submissions and documents that testing was conducted by an ASCA-accredited laboratory using ASCA-compliant methods.
The manufacturer submits the ASCA Summary Test Report alongside a Declaration of Conformity as part of the 510(k), De Novo, or other premarket submission. The FDA will not request additional information about testing methodologies — reducing review time and back-and-forth.
The manufacturers are ultimately responsible for the test plan and the appropriate selection and use of recognized consensus standards, including ISO 13485 Quality Management Systems and ISO 14971 Risk Management. However, through ASCA, Compatible Electronics is able to take a more active role in developing the plan. The test plan will be guided by IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, and any relevant FDA published guidance documents.
Essential performance is a nuanced topic and a common source of confusion. Occasionally the FDA sees test reports (outside of ASCA) with essential performances that don't make sense — such as listing a "remote controller" as essential performance for a device where it is not. If Compatible Electronics has questions about the essential performances identified in the test plan, the ASCA framework allows us to request additional FDA guidance via the ASCA summary test plan report. This prevents downstream questions from the FDA and helps streamline the path to clearance.
If the test lab has questions with aspects of the test plan, the test lab can send a request in the ASCA summary test plan report to receive additional guidance from the FDA, which helps streamline the testing requirements that will be part of the 510(k) submittal or letter-to-file FDA path.
🔎 The 2018 FDA guidance Appropriate Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards in Premarket Submissions for Medical Devices provides helpful information regarding declarations of conformity and their essential role in regulatory review. Manufacturers should continue to rely on other FDA-recognized standards and provide conformance declarations in premarket submissions; however, only ASCA-eligible standards qualify for the streamlined review benefits of the ASCA Program.
In accordance with the MDUFA IV commitment letter, the ASCA includes both cross-cutting (horizontal) and device-specific (vertical) standards that are of public health significance and provide the means to establish acceptance criteria. The FDA selected standards and tests from the biocompatibility, basic safety, and essential performance series based on input from the medical device community.
The following definitions are drawn directly from FDA ASCA program guidance and are used consistently throughout the program.
The process by which the FDA identifies standards to which manufacturers of medical devices may submit a declaration of conformity to demonstrate compliance with pertinent FD&C Act provisions.
A status granted by the FDA to accreditation bodies that demonstrate competency in accreditation activities by completing the application process outlined in the ASCA program guidance. ASCA-recognized accreditation bodies may accredit qualified testing laboratories.
Third-party attestation that a conformity assessment body (such as a testing laboratory) has formally demonstrated its competence to perform specific conformity assessment tasks. (ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
A status given by the FDA to testing laboratories that indicate testing competency through the application process outlined in the ASCA program guidance. Distinct from any ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation that an accreditation body grants for other purposes.
A report included in a manufacturer's premarket submission to the FDA, together with a Declaration of Conformity. This summary report decreases the need for the FDA to request additional information regarding testing methodologies.
A manufacturer's statement that their device conforms to a specific FDA-recognized standard. When submitted with an ASCA Summary Test Report, the DoC carries enhanced weight in the premarket review process.
Imposing temporary restrictions on one or more FDA-recognized consensus standards or test methods within a testing laboratory's scope of ASCA Accreditation.
Cancelling the full scope of a testing laboratory's ASCA Accreditation; removes the organization entirely from the ASCA Program.
The following FDA guidance documents are relevant to the ASCA program and to premarket submissions involving declarations of conformity. Manufacturers should consult these alongside the specific standard requirements.
🔎 For a plain-language explanation of how the ASCA program affects your FDA submission strategy, see our resource page: FDA ASCA Explained.
Three ASCA-Accredited Facilities — ASCA ID TL-80 (Lake Forest), TL-81 (Brea), TL-82 (Newbury Park); parallel and overflow scheduling available
NVLAP Accredited, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — Lab Code 200527-0; the underlying ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation is a prerequisite for ASCA Accreditation
ILAC-MRA Recognized — test data accepted in 100+ countries; a single test campaign can support FDA ASCA submission, NRTL listing, and international IEC 60601-1 compliance simultaneously
Active Test Plan Collaboration — ASCA allows our engineers to actively guide test plan development, flag essential performance questions, and request FDA guidance — reducing downstream surprises
Efficient Scheduling — safety, EMC, usability, and alarm systems testing conducted concurrently to minimize total project time
Founded 1985 — 40 years of medical device testing experience; engineers familiar with IEC 60601 standard interpretation and FDA submission requirements
Contact Compatible Electronics to discuss your FDA premarket submission testing. We'll identify the applicable ASCA-eligible standards, outline the test plan, and provide a quote for all three facilities.
www.celectronics.com